The same year were appointed two of the ancients of the people to be judges, such as the Lord spoke of, that wickedness came from Babylon from ancient judges, who seemed to govern the people.
All Commentaries on Daniel 13:5 Go To Daniel 13
George Leo Haydock
AD 1849
Judges. The Jews say they were Achab and Sedecias, (Origen) as this text seems to allude to Jeremias xxix. 21. or xxxiii. 14. But how were they burnt? since the Jews appear to have stoned them, unless they were delivered up to the king's officers, ver. 61. (Calmet)
The captives under Joakim, were better treated than those who were taken nineteen years afterwards, when all fell into a heavier bondage. (Worthington)
The might enjoy possessions, (Haydock) and have judges of their nation. (Calmet)
Cappel. urges this difficulty, and many others, to show that this account is fabulous. But as the Jews were allowed to follow their religion, the Chaldeans would strive to keep them in good order. It is not said that Joakim was one of the captives. He might have settled long before at Babylon, where Helcias probably brought up his daughter in the fear of God, ver. 3. The judges might also have had authority before over the Israelites, in Assyria, who were now all under the same government, ver. 57. (Houbigant.; Pref.) Ver. 7. Noon, at which time the Jews dined, (ver. 13.; Jos. vita) and the streets were as little frequented as they are at night among us. Hence the judges thought this a fit opportunity. (Calmet) Ver. 9. Mind. They were distracted by love, (Haydock) and rendered foolish. Ver. 18. Back door, leading from the house. Strangers came by the other gates. (Calmet)
Susanna had not perhaps at first intended to bathe. Cappel. accuses her of imprudence, without reason. He cannot believe that the old judges would be so sottish as they appear to have been. (Houbigant.) Ver. 22. Death of the soul, (St. Jerome) and also of the body, if the adultery were detected. How much does Susanna surpass the famed Lucretia, who slew herself to show that she had not consented to her violation! Si adultera cur laudata? Si pudica cur occisa? (St. Augustine, de Civ. Dei. i. 19.; St. Ambrose, de Sp. iii. 3.) (Calmet) Ver. 24. Out. So the law ordained, when a woman was assaulted. (Haydock) Ver. 29. People, for greater show of justice. (Worthington)
We here behold the forms. Ver. 32. Uncovered, pretending that respect for the company required it, or perhaps that they might detect her guilt by her blushes. (Calmet)
But their real motive is here disclosed. (Haydock) Ver. 34. Head, saying, "Thy malice brings on this chastisement, and not we. "(Lyran.)
They appear to discharge their conscience, (Leviticus i. 4. and xxiv. 14.) not as judges but as accusers. The people pass sentence, ver. 41. Adulteresses were stoned, Leviticus xx. 10. (Calmet) Ver. 41. Death. The multitude approved of this sentence, which the judges pronounced, pretending to act agreeably to the law, Deuteronomy xxii. (Worthington) Ver. 45. Boy. He was about twelve years old. (St. Ignatius, ad Magn.; Sulpit. ii.; Theod.)
He might walk out, though he lodged at court. (Houbigant.)
God enabled him to declare that Susanna was innocent. The people had consented to her death, but he stands up in her defence. (Worthington) Ver. 46. Clear. This form is often used, Acts xviii. 6., and Matthew xxvii. 24. Ver. 48. Truth. They had taken no precautions to ascertain it; which they ought to have done the more, as Susanna had always been highly esteemed. (Calmet)
As the witnesses were positive, she must die, except their falsehood could be manifested, which none suspected. (Houbigant.)
