Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinks that he has reasons he might trust in the flesh, I more:
All Commentaries on Philippians 3:4 Go To Philippians 3
John Chrysostom
AD 407
Suppose Paul had been a Gentile and had condemned circumcision (not circumcision itself but those who underwent it inappropriately). It would then have seemed that he might be demeaning it because he did not have the good fortune to be born a Jew. He would have appeared to be ignorant of lofty things, having no experience of them. But Paul speaks as a Jew. He speaks as one who shares in Jewish culture. He does not despise as a nonparticipant but criticizes as one who has made a reasonable assessment, not in ignorance but with intimate knowledge. .